← All Blog Posts
By Benjamin J. Clark Perron Spectracones $n=5$ SNIEP & 3D Plotly
Research Blog Post · Polyhedral Spectracone Exploration

Character Table Spectracones & the $n=5$ SNIEP

Two character-table constructions cover 99.97% by area of the Loewy–McDonald benchmark for $\sigma=(1,a,a,b,b)$. The remaining curved gap shows what a fixed collection of linear inequalities misses. We then compare the same constructions in the three-parameter slice $\sigma=(1,a,a,b,c)$.

Part I: Perron Similarities and Character Tables

Fixing eigenvectors turns entrywise nonnegativity into linear inequalities.

1.1 Perron Similarities and Spectracones

The symmetric nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem (SNIEP) asks which real lists are spectra of entrywise nonnegative symmetric matrices. For lists of length at most four, the Perron condition $\lambda_1=\max_i|\lambda_i|$ and nonnegative trace suffice. Dimension five introduces additional obstructions. Here $A\ge0$ always means entrywise nonnegative.

An invertible matrix $S$ is a Perron similarity if it diagonalizes an irreducible nonnegative matrix. Johnson and Paparella developed the real theory [JP16] and later its complex extension [JP25]. In the general theory spectral vectors may be complex; the plots below use real vectors. We place a positive Perron column first.

$$ \mathcal C(S)=\{x\in\mathbb C^n:S\operatorname{diag}(x)S^{-1}\ge0\},\qquad \mathcal T(S)=\{x\in\mathcal C(S):x_1=1\}. $$

The entries of the realizing matrix depend linearly on $x$. Thus $\mathcal C(S)$ is polyhedral, and its normalized section is a polytope; the positive Perron column ensures $|x_i|\le1$ on this section. A Perron similarity is ideal when $\mathcal C(S)=\mathcal C_r(S)$, the conical hull of its rows. Character tables have the further useful property that one column of the realizing matrix tests nonnegativity of the entire matrix.

1.2 Character Tables Give Explicit Symmetric Realizations

Character tables are ideal Perron similarities

Gershnik–Lewis–Paparella

Let $G$ have conjugacy classes $\mathcal K_1=\{1\},\ldots,\mathcal K_r$, sizes $c_k$, and character table $Q=[\chi_i(g_k)]$, with the trivial character first. Character orthogonality gives

$$ QD_cQ^*=|G|I,\qquad Q^{-1}=\frac1{|G|}D_cQ^*,\qquad D_c=\operatorname{diag}(c_1,\ldots,c_r). $$

For $x_1=1$, the matrix $A=Q\operatorname{diag}(x)Q^{-1}$ is entrywise nonnegative exactly when the following $r$ quantities are real and nonnegative [GLP26, Theorem 4.3]:

$$ L_i(x)=\sum_{k=1}^r c_k\chi_i(g_k)x_k =d_i+\sum_{k=2}^r c_k\chi_i(g_k)x_k\ge0,\qquad d_i=\chi_i(1). $$

For real $Q$ and real $x$, the column normalization

$$ U=\frac1{\sqrt{|G|}}QD_c^{1/2},\qquad UU^T=I,\qquad A=U\operatorname{diag}(x)U^T $$

proves that the resulting nonnegative matrix is symmetric. The first column of $Q$ is the positive degree vector $(d_i)$. Row normalization by $D_d^{-1}$ instead makes this column all ones; it preserves entrywise nonnegativity, but generally changes symmetry. For the complex Fourier table, equal real eigenvalues on conjugate frequency pairs give the real symmetric specialization used below.

For the trivial character, $L_1(x)=1+\sum_{k=2}^r c_kx_k$. Along $x_2=\cdots=x_r=t$, this gives $t\ge-1/(|G|-1)$; every nontrivial-character inequality becomes $d_i(1-t)\ge0$. These bounds explain the shared diagonal apex in each plotted family.

Assigning the repeated eigenvalues to different nonidentity classes changes the halfspaces. We call assignments equivalent when they define the same polytope in the ordered chamber. The groups studied here are a selected family, not an exhaustive list of groups with five classes: the dihedral group of order $14$, for example, also has a real $5\times5$ character table [D14].

Part II: The Two-Parameter Slice $\sigma=(1,a,a,b,b)$

Comparing the selected character-table constructions with a curved benchmark.

2.1 The Loewy–McDonald Benchmark

Fix $1\ge a\ge b\ge-1$. The ordered triangle has area $2$. Imposing trace nonnegativity $1+2a+2b\ge0$ leaves a quadrilateral with vertices $(-1/4,-1/4),(1,1),(1,-1),(1/2,-1)$ and area $23/16$.

The benchmark used in this article

$$ \mathcal B=\{(a,b):1\ge a\ge b\ge-1,\ 1+2a+2b\ge0, \ (1+4ab\ge0\ \text{or}\ 1+a+2b\ge0)\}. $$

This is the constructively realizable benchmark associated with the classical Soules and Loewy–McDonald constructions [MN00], [LM04]. We use its explicit geometry for the comparisons below; this article does not supply a necessity proof identifying $\mathcal B$ with the entire SNIEP slice.

Write

$$ K_1=\left(\frac{\sqrt5-1}{4},-\frac{\sqrt5+1}{4}\right),\qquad K_2=\left(\frac{\sqrt3-1}{2},-\frac{\sqrt3+1}{4}\right). $$

The lower boundary is the trace-zero segment $b=-1/2-a$ for $-1/4\le a\le K_{1,a}$, the hyperbolic arc $b=-1/(4a)$ for $K_{1,a}\le a\le K_{2,a}$, and the line $b=-(1+a)/2$ for $K_{2,a}\le a\le1$. The remaining boundary follows $b=a$ and $a=1$.

Integrating the vertical width gives the exact area

$$ \operatorname{Area}(\mathcal B)= \frac{22+\sqrt5-2\sqrt3}{16} +\frac14\log\!\left(\frac{2(\sqrt3-1)}{\sqrt5-1}\right) \approx 1.340574514. $$

What is being measured? Every percentage in the two-parameter discussion is ordinary area in the $(a,b)$ coordinates, divided by $\operatorname{Area}(\mathcal B)$ above. Coverage of that benchmark is a statement about these constructions; identifying it with the entire SNIEP slice requires a separate necessity proof.

2.2 Selected $5\times5$ Character-Table Pieces

There are $\binom42=6$ assignments of $(a,a,b,b)$ to the four nonidentity classes: $(a,a,b,b),(a,b,a,b),(a,b,b,a),(b,a,a,b),(b,a,b,a),(b,b,a,a)$.

Character tables and the individual assignment pieces

Dihedral and quaternion groups of order eight

The two groups have the same table, with class sizes $(1,1,2,2,2)$:

$$Q_{D_8} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 \\ 1 & 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 \\ 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 \\ 2 & -2 & 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad c = (1, 1, 2, 2, 2).$$

Their six assignments give two pieces, each representing three assignments. When $x_2=a$, the active condition is $1+3a+4b\ge0$; the triangle has vertices $(-1/7,-1/7),(1,1),(1,-1)$ and area $8/7$. When $x_2=b$, the active conditions are $1+4a+3b\ge0$ and $1-4a+3b\ge0$; the triangle has vertices $(-1/7,-1/7),(0,-1/3),(1,1)$ and area $4/21$. Adding its two inequalities shows $b\ge-1/3$.

The symmetric and alternating groups

For $S_4$ use class sizes $(1,6,8,6,3)$; for $A_5$ use $(1,20,15,12,12)$:

$$Q_{S_4} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 1 \\ 2 & 0 & -1 & 0 & 2 \\ 3 & 1 & 0 & -1 & -1 \\ 3 & -1 & 0 & 1 & -1 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad Q_{A_5} = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 \\ 3 & 0 & -1 & \phi & 1-\phi \\ 3 & 0 & -1 & 1-\phi & \phi \\ 4 & 1 & 0 & -1 & -1 \\ 5 & -1 & 1 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix}, \quad \phi = \frac{1+\sqrt{5}}{2}.$$

Each produces four distinct pieces in this slice. The shared diagonal apices are $(-1/23,-1/23)$ and $(-1/59,-1/59)$, respectively. Both selected unions are contained in the first $D_8$ piece; the apex locations alone do not prove containment. The table below reports union areas, so overlapping pieces are counted once.

The cyclic group $\mathbb Z_5$

The Fourier table $F_5=[\omega^{jk}]_{j,k=0}^4$, $\omega=e^{2\pi i/5}$, becomes real symmetric on the paired assignment $(1,a,b,b,a)$. With $\phi=(1+\sqrt5)/2$, the three nonnegativity tests are

$$ 1+2a+2b\ge0,\qquad 1+\phi^{-1}a-\phi b\ge0,\qquad 1-\phi a+\phi^{-1}b\ge0. $$

The resulting triangle has vertices $(-1/4,-1/4),K_1,(1,1)$ and area $5\sqrt5/16\approx0.698771243$. It exactly follows the trace-zero segment down to $K_1$.

Interactive 2D Character Cone Explorer: $\sigma = (1, a, a, b, b)$

Click any group button to inspect its individual polyhedral orbits, compare the Selected $5 \times 5$ Union ($96.42\%$) against the Full Union with $V_4 \oplus [1]$ ($99.97\%$), or view the 6-panel grid below.

Optional six-panel comparison

6-Panel Simultaneous Group Comparison Grid: $\sigma = (1, a, a, b, b)$

Side-by-side comparison of the five selected constructions ($D_8$, $S_4$, $A_5$, $\mathbb{Z}_5$, $V_4 \oplus [1]$) and their $99.97\%$ polyhedral union.

2.3 What the Adjoined Block Adds

Before adjoining a block, the selected union is $D_8\cup\mathbb Z_5$; the displayed $S_4,A_5$ pieces add no area. Its area is $1.292589478$, or $96.42\%$ of $\mathcal B$. It misses the small curved gap and a triangular wedge with vertices $P_*,Q_*,(1,-1)$.

The golden-ratio facet meets $1+a+2b=0$ at $P_*$ and $1+3a+4b=0$ at $Q_*$:

$$ P_*=\left(\frac{4\sqrt5-5}{11},-\frac{3+2\sqrt5}{11}\right) \approx(0.358570,-0.679285),\qquad Q_*=\left(\frac{16\sqrt5-11}{61},-\frac{7+12\sqrt5}{61}\right) \approx(0.406182,-0.554636). $$

The wedge has area approximately $0.047611591$, or $3.55\%$ of the benchmark.

The adjoined construction $H_4\oplus[1]$

Take the Klein four-group table $H_4$ and adjoin a scalar eigenvalue $a$:

$$S_{4 \oplus 1} = H_4 \oplus [1] = \begin{pmatrix} 1 & 1 & 1 & 1 & 0 \\ 1 & 1 & -1 & -1 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & 1 & -1 & 0 \\ 1 & -1 & -1 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 & 0 & 1 \end{pmatrix}, \qquad \Lambda = \operatorname{diag}(1, a, b, b, a).$$

The resulting matrix is $B\oplus[a]$, with spectrum $(1,a,a,b,b)$. Its nonnegativity conditions are

$$ a\ge0,\qquad 1+a+2b\ge0,\qquad 1+a-2b\ge0,\qquad 1-a\ge0. $$

In the ordered chamber this is the quadrilateral $(0,0),(1,1),(1,-1),(0,-1/2)$, of area $5/4$. It fills the triangular wedge. We use the notation $V_4\oplus[1]$ for this construction; $H_4\oplus[1]$ is a block diagonalizer, not a Perron similarity under the irreducibility definition above.

The condition supplies a reducible realization; the equation $1+a+2b=0$ alone does not force every realization to be reducible. For example, $(1,1/3,1/3,-2/3,-2/3)$ has a strictly positive symmetric circulant realization whose first row is

$$ \frac1{15}(1,\ 2+3\phi,\ 5-3\phi,\ 5-3\phi,\ 2+3\phi). $$
Compare the selected union before and after adjoining the block

Union Without vs. With the Reducible Piece $V_4 \oplus [1]$

Left: The union of the selected $5 \times 5$ character tables ($D_8 \cup S_4 \cup A_5 \cup \mathbb{Z}_5$, $96.42\%$), highlighting the missing $3.55\%$ triangular wedge $\triangle P_* Q_* (1,-1)$ along $1 + a + 2b = 0$. Right: Adding the reducible block $V_4 \oplus [1]$ fills the wedge completely, boosting coverage to $99.97\%$.

2.4 The Remaining Curved Gap

Once the adjoined block is present, the final selected union is already $\mathbb Z_5\cup(V_4\oplus[1])$. The $D_8/Q_8$, $S_4$, and $A_5$ pieces provide useful comparisons, but add no area once these two constructions are present: for $a\le0$ the $D_8$ pieces lie in the $\mathbb Z_5$ triangle, and for $a\ge0$ they lie in the adjoined quadrilateral.

$$ \operatorname{Area}\bigl(\mathbb Z_5\cup(V_4\oplus[1])\bigr) =\frac{256-9\sqrt5}{176}\approx1.340201069. $$

The fraction covered is $99.97214\%$. The missing area is approximately $0.000373445$, or $0.027857\%$. It lies between the hyperbolic arc $K_1K_2$ and the two straight segments $K_1P_*$ and $P_*K_2$ shown in the figure below.

Selected Union and Curved Gap on the $0.03\%$ Loewy–McDonald Hyperbolic Gap

Left: The ordered trace chamber and selected constructions. Right: Microscopic zoom into $a \in [0.295, 0.382]$ showing the Loewy–McDonald hyperbola $1 + 4ab = 0$ bowing below $K_1 \to P_* \to K_2$.

A finite collection of fixed similarities gives a finite polyhedral union. It therefore cannot equal this benchmark, whose boundary includes a nontrivial hyperbolic arc. If a separate necessity theorem identifies the benchmark with the entire SNIEP slice, the same observation applies to that full slice.

Areas in the $(a,b)$ coordinates; all percentages use $\operatorname{Area}(\mathcal B)$.
Region Conditions or description inside the chamber Area % of benchmark
Loewy–McDonald benchmark $1+2a+2b\ge0$ and $(1+4ab\ge0\ \text{or}\ 1+a+2b\ge0)$ 1.340574514 100.00%
Full selected union $\mathbb Z_5\cup(V_4\oplus[1])$ 1.340201069 99.97%
Selected union without adjoined block $D_8\cup\mathbb Z_5$ (also contains the selected $S_4,A_5$ pieces) 1.292589478 96.42%
$V_4\oplus[1]$ $a\ge0,\ 1+a+2b\ge0$ 1.250000000 93.24%
$D_8/Q_8$ union Two assignment pieces 1.150476190 85.82%
$D_8$ piece 1 $1+3a+4b\ge0$; exact area $8/7$ 1.142857143 85.25%
$D_8$ piece 2 $1+4a+3b\ge0,\ 1-4a+3b\ge0$; exact area $4/21$ 0.190476190 14.21%
$S_4$ union Four assignment pieces 1.049424006 78.28%
$\mathbb Z_5$ $1+2a+2b\ge0,\ 1-\phi a+\phi^{-1}b\ge0$ 0.698771243 52.12%
$A_5$ union Four assignment pieces 0.150889828 11.26%

Decimals are approximations. Areas refer to the stated chamber; axis padding is only a display setting.

Part III: The Three-Parameter Slice $\sigma=(1,a,a,b,c)$

Constructive inner approximations inside the ordered trace polytope.

3.1 The Ambient Trace Polytope

Split the second repeated pair and impose $1\ge a\ge b\ge c\ge-1$. The natural necessary container is

$$ \Delta_3=\{(a,b,c):1\ge a\ge b\ge c\ge-1,\ 1+2a+b+c\ge0\}. $$

It has five facets, six vertices, and volume $55/48\approx1.145833333$. Its three positive-trace sign vertices are $(1,1,1),(1,1,-1),(1,-1,-1)$. The other three vertices lie on the trace-zero face:

$$ \left(-\frac14,-\frac14,-\frac14\right),\qquad (0,0,-1),\qquad \left(\frac12,-1,-1\right). $$

The character constructions below certify realizability of their own regions; the ambient trace polytope is not itself a realizability criterion.

3.2 The Three-Dimensional Assignment Pieces

There are $4!/2!=12$ assignments of $(a,a,b,c)$ to the nonidentity classes. They give three distinct $D_8/Q_8$ pieces, seven $S_4$ pieces, and seven $A_5$ pieces. These are intersections of spectratopes with the ordered slice, so all are convex polytopes.

The three $D_8/Q_8$ tetrahedra

The following inequalities are additional to those defining $\Delta_3$:

$$\begin{aligned} T_1\ (x_2=a):\quad &1+3a+2b+2c\ge0,\qquad 1-a-2b+2c\ge0,\\ T_2\ (x_2=b):\quad &1+4a+b+2c\ge0,\qquad 1-4a+b+2c\ge0,\\ T_3\ (x_2=c):\quad &1+4a+2b+c\ge0,\quad 1-4a+2b+c\ge0,\quad 1-2b+c\ge0. \end{aligned}$$

Set $E=(-1/7,-1/7,-1/7)$ and $O=(1,1,1)$. Each piece has four vertices:

$$\begin{aligned} T_1&=\operatorname{conv}\{E,O,(1,-1,-1),(0,0,-1/2)\},\\ T_2&=\operatorname{conv}\{E,O,(0,-1/3,-1/3),(0,0,-1/2)\},\\ T_3&=\operatorname{conv}\{E,O,(0,-1/3,-1/3),(0,0,-1)\}. \end{aligned}$$

Their volumes are $4/21$, $2/63$, and $4/63$, respectively. Since $T_2\subseteq T_3$ and $\operatorname{Vol}(T_1\cap T_3)=292/6825$,

$$ \operatorname{Vol}(T_1\cup T_2\cup T_3) =\frac4{21}+\frac4{63}-\frac{292}{6825} =\frac{4324}{20475}\approx0.211184371. $$

Containment of the selected $S_4$ and $A_5$ pieces

All seven $S_4$ pieces lie inside $T_1$. The selected $A_5$ pieces are contained in $T_1$ as well. Their union volumes are approximately $0.163113364$ and $0.022785841$. These groups illustrate different eigenvector choices, but contribute no additional volume to the selected nonabelian union.

An exact vertex certificate for the $S_4$ containment

The first column below records $(x_2,x_3,x_4,x_5)$. The last two columns give the minimum values, over the listed vertices, of $1+3a+2b+2c$ and $1-a-2b+2c$. Every minimum is nonnegative; linearity and convexity prove containment in $T_1$.

Assignment Vertices First minimum Second minimum
$(a,a,b,c)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (0,0,\frac{-1}{3}),\quad (\frac{1}{13},\frac{-3}{13},\frac{-3}{13}),\quad (1,1,1)$ $\frac{4}{13}$ $0$
$(a,a,c,b)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (\frac{1}{13},\frac{-3}{13},\frac{-3}{13}),\quad (\frac{1}{13},\frac{1}{13},\frac{-5}{13}),\quad (\frac{1}{7},\frac{-1}{7},\frac{-3}{7}),\quad (1,1,1)$ $\frac{2}{7}$ $0$
$(a,b,a,c)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (0,\frac{-1}{11},\frac{-1}{11}),\quad (0,0,\frac{-1}{3}),\quad (1,1,1)$ $\frac{1}{3}$ $0$
$(a,b,c,a)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (\frac{1}{13},\frac{1}{13},\frac{-5}{13}),\quad (\frac{1}{5},\frac{-1}{5},\frac{-1}{5}),\quad (1,1,1)$ $\frac{8}{13}$ $0$
$(a,c,a,b)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (0,\frac{-1}{11},\frac{-1}{11}),\quad (0,0,\frac{-1}{8}),\quad (1,1,1)$ $\frac{7}{11}$ $0$
$(a,c,b,a)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (0,0,\frac{-1}{8}),\quad (\frac{1}{5},\frac{-1}{5},\frac{-1}{5}),\quad (1,1,1)$ $\frac{16}{23}$ $0$
$(b,a,c,a)$ $(\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23},\frac{-1}{23}),\quad (\frac{1}{13},\frac{1}{13},\frac{-5}{13}),\quad (1,-1,-1),\quad (1,1,1)$ $0$ $0$

The adjoined $V_4\oplus[1]$ polytope

Apply $H_4$ to $(1,a,b,c)$ and adjoin $[a]$. Inside $\Delta_3$ the active conditions are

$$ a\ge0,\qquad 1+a+b+c\ge0,\qquad \boxed{1-a-b+c\ge0}. $$

The other two $H_4$ inequalities are redundant here. The five vertices are $(0,-1/2,-1/2),(0,0,-1),(0,0,0),(1,-1,-1),(1,1,1)$. Its volume is $5/12$, or $4/11\approx36.36\%$ of $\Delta_3$. Dropping the final inequality would give a different, larger region.

Why $\mathbb Z_5$ has zero three-dimensional volume

A real symmetric circulant has equal eigenvalues on each conjugate frequency pair. For the spectrum $(1,a,a,b,c)$ this forces $b=c$. Thus the Fourier construction occupies a two-dimensional triangle on that wall, with vertices $(-1/4,-1/4,-1/4)$, $(K_{1,a},K_{1,b},K_{1,b})$, and $(1,1,1)$. Adding it changes the set but does not change its three-dimensional volume.

Three-dimensional volumes in $(a,b,c)$ coordinates. Percentages use $55/48$, not the unknown full realizable volume.
Region Conditions or description Vertices Volume % of $\Delta_3$
Trace polytope $\Delta_3$ $1\ge a\ge b\ge c\ge-1,\ 1+2a+b+c\ge0$ 6 1.145833333 100.00%
Adjoined $V_4\oplus[1]$ $a\ge0,\ 1+a+b+c\ge0,\ 1-a-b+c\ge0$ 5 0.416666667 36.36%
$D_8/Q_8$ union $T_1\cup T_2\cup T_3=T_1\cup T_3$ — 0.211184371 18.43%
$D_8$ piece $T_1$ Exact volume $\frac{4}{21}$ 4 0.190476190 16.62%
$D_8$ piece $T_2$ Exact volume $\frac{2}{63}$ 4 0.031746032 2.77%
$D_8$ piece $T_3$ Exact volume $\frac{4}{63}$ 4 0.063492063 5.54%
$S_4$ union Seven assignment pieces, contained in $T_1$ 4–5 per piece 0.163113364 14.24%
$A_5$ union Seven assignment pieces, contained in $T_1$ 4–5 per piece 0.022785841 1.99%
$\mathbb Z_5$ lamina Located on $b=c$; area is two-dimensional 3 (2D) 0.000000000 0.00%

3.3 Interactive Three-Dimensional Explorer

Select a group to inspect its assignment pieces against the ambient polytope. The surfaces below use the same character-table inequalities as the cross-sections.

Character-table pieces inside $\Delta_3$

Drag to rotate. Hover for coordinates; use the legend to hide individual pieces.

Optional 2 × 2 group dashboard

3.4 Cross-Sections and the $b=c$ Wall

At fixed $a$, slice the triangle $a\ge b\ge c\ge-1$ by $b+c\ge-1-2a$. The slider spans $-1/4\le a\le1$. The companion plot shows where the slice meets the repeated-pair wall $b=c$.

Live Interactive Cross-Section Explorer: $(b, c)$-Plane at Fixed $a$

Drag the slider or click a preset value of $a$ to sweep the slicing plane through $\Delta_3$ and watch the character cones ignite and merge.

Optional six-panel cross-section comparison

6-Panel Cross-Sectional Tomography Grid across $a \in \{-0.15, 0.00, 0.20, 0.40, 0.60, 0.80\}$

Compare six fixed-$a$ cross-sections simultaneously from the negative-$a$ regime ($a = -0.15$, before $D_8$ ignites) up to $a = 0.80$.

  • Negative $a$: the selected nonabelian pieces begin at $a=-1/7$ for $D_8$, $a=-1/23$ for $S_4$, and $a=-1/59$ for $A_5$. Their absence below those thresholds reflects the limitations of these fixed similarities. In fact, the whole $a\le0$ part of $\Delta_3$ is already symmetrically realizable by the Suleĭmanova theorem: there is at most one positive eigenvalue and the trace is nonnegative [GLP26, §1].
  • The adjoined block at $a=0$: it covers the triangle $0\ge b\ge c\ge-1$, $b+c\ge-1$, with vertices $(0,0),(0,-1),(-1/2,-1/2)$ in $(b,c)$ coordinates.
  • Containment persists in each slice: every $S_4$ cross-section lies inside the first $D_8$ cross-section. Overlapping translucent fills should not be interpreted as new spectral coverage.

The meshes and clipped polygons are numerical visualizations of the displayed halfspaces. The reported areas and volumes are computed separately from the corresponding polytopes or analytic boundary formulas; sampled hyperbola points are used only for drawing.

References

  1. [GLP26] D. Z. Gershnik, A. J. Lewis, and P. Paparella, Character tables are ideal Perron similarities, Journal of Algebra 694 (2026), 782–800. Published paper; arXiv version 2. The character inequalities are Theorem 4.3.
  2. [JP16] C. R. Johnson and P. Paparella, Perron spectratopes and the real nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem, Linear Algebra and its Applications 493 (2016), 281–300. Preprint.
  3. [JP25] C. R. Johnson and P. Paparella, Perron similarities and the nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 378 (2025), 8361–8389. Published paper; Preprint.
  4. [MN00] J. J. McDonald and M. Neumann, The Soules approach to the inverse eigenvalue problem for nonnegative symmetric matrices of order $n\le5$, Contemporary Mathematics 259 (2000), 387–390. Author’s publication list.
  5. [LM04] R. Loewy and J. J. McDonald, The symmetric nonnegative inverse eigenvalue problem for $5\times5$ matrices, Linear Algebra and its Applications 393 (2004), 275–298. Published paper.
  6. [D14] GroupNames, character table of the dihedral group of order $14$ (labelled $D_7$ in the convention used by that database). Character table and class sizes.